IB DP TOK | How Historians Know What They Know Lesson Walkthrough
Students apply the CARGO source-evaluation framework and compare historical interpretations to examine how historians justify claims about the past.
Page 3
Browse all science resourcesStudents apply the CARGO source-evaluation framework and compare historical interpretations to examine how historians justify claims about the past.
Students debate four philosophical positions, sort mathematical objects and consider connections between abstract mathematics and physical reality.
Students rate mathematical beauty, compare approaches to proof and take part in an intuition tribunal to examine the roles of elegance, imagination and intuition.
Students compare quantitative and qualitative approaches, design a study and examine replication and the challenges of researching human behaviour.
Students apply consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics to moral dilemmas and defend a framework in a structured classroom debate.
Students compare textbook accounts, examine the influences on a historian’s perspective and discuss how to distinguish revision from distortion.
Students sort scientific and non-scientific claims, design falsifiable hypotheses and consider how evidence, creativity and changing explanations shape science.
Students map the role of values in science, analyse research case studies and discuss funding choices and the communication of scientific knowledge.
Students analyse a fictional group chat, identify common logical fallacies and reconstruct arguments through a classroom tribunal activity.
Students explore proof by contradiction, debate whether 0.999… equals 1 and use infinity paradoxes to question certainty and the limits of mathematical knowledge.