Page 20
Browse all science resourcesStudents dissect the wording and assumptions of prescribed titles, test possible thesis directions and plan their choice of areas of knowledge. Uses May 2026 prescribed titles for past-session practice.
Students draw and compare regional maps, examine naming and perspective, and discuss how language and power shape geographical knowledge.
Students map their information environment, examine engagement, personalisation and feedback loops, and debate who should shape access to information.
Students use Resistance Bingo and historical case studies to explore paradigm shifts and reasons scientists accept or resist new ideas.
Students analyse ethical case studies, map chains of responsibility and debate the obligations that arise from producing and applying knowledge.
Students compare credibility judgements across sources and create power maps to examine who validates knowledge and who gains access to it.
Students compare rationalism and empiricism through a fictional murder investigation, Molyneux’s problem and questions about knowledge through reason and experience.
Students record perception experiments, compare cultural influences and use perception audits to explore how experience contributes to our understanding of reality.
Students diagnose paragraphs, develop knowledge claims and counterclaims, plan an essay outline and use peer critique to strengthen an argument.
Students map arguments, distinguish validity from soundness and examine induction and fallacies through examples and media extracts.
