IB DP TOK | Power Gatekeeping and Knowledge Lesson Walkthrough
Students compare credibility judgements across sources and create power maps to examine who validates knowledge and who gains access to it.
Page 2
Browse all science resourcesStudents compare credibility judgements across sources and create power maps to examine who validates knowledge and who gains access to it.
Students compare rationalism and empiricism through a fictional murder investigation, Molyneux’s problem and questions about knowledge through reason and experience.
Students record perception experiments, compare cultural influences and use perception audits to explore how experience contributes to our understanding of reality.
Students diagnose paragraphs, develop knowledge claims and counterclaims, plan an essay outline and use peer critique to strengthen an argument.
Students map arguments, distinguish validity from soundness and examine induction and fallacies through examples and media extracts.
Students build and share a bank of specific real-world examples, connect examples to knowledge claims and practise integrating them into essay paragraphs. Uses May 2026 prescribed titles for past-session practice.
Students examine research case studies, apply three ethical principles and take part in a knowledge tribunal to explore the costs of producing knowledge about people.
Students examine the purpose of the TOK exhibition, annotate and compare commentaries, and begin connecting specific objects to a prompt.
Students analyse historical metaphors and rewrite an account of the past to explore how language and narrative shape historical knowledge.
Students take part in a certainty auction, apply levels of Cartesian doubt and use a doubt-machine activity to examine how knowledge claims can be challenged.